Work-based Project Plan – Project Management

Assessment
You will produce a project plan for a suitable project from your work place. The Project Plan will include the use of Project Management tools and techniques
Highlights of Assignment
It is a work-based project plan. You need to create a project plan with maximum 1000 words.

Assignment -2 –Work-based Project Plan – Project Management
You will produce a project plan for a suitable project for your work-place. The Project Plan will include the use of Project Management tools and techniques studied and discussed in the class. You will need to submit the project plan (maximum 1000 words in 10 pages – A4 size) with clear indication of your contributions.
List of projects to be considered (only examples):

Any specific project related to your work place or any other project such as
• Launching of a new mobile phone in the market
• OR Releasing a new system such as HR system in our organization
• OR Releasing a new system such as Finance system in our organization
Description of
Assessment Task You should produce a Project Plan for a suitable project for your workplace.
You should include the following:
• Project Objectives & Introduction
• Product/Work Breakdown Structure;
• Activity List;
• Gantt Chart in MS Project;
• Network Diagram with Critical Path identified;
• Risk Log/Register;
• Quality Plan.
Unit Learning Outcomes assessed: Demonstrate an in depth knowledge and systematic understanding of project management theory and tools linked to the planning of projects
Select and applyappropriateprojectmanagement tools andtechniquesforthe purposeof effectiveplanningof projects.
Format MS Word & MS Project
Resources/Support Available Class discussion to clarify Assignment
Unit resources on BREO
Assessment Criteria See assessment criteria marking grid, 2 overleaf.
Details of how feedback will be provided 2Q and feedback given on-line through Turn-It-In and marked assessment criteria marking grid.

Assessment Criteria Marking Grid
Criterion Weight <35% 35%-39% 40% – 49% 50% – 59% 60% – 69% >=70%
Project Objectives & Introduction 10% Project Objectives/Intro missing or unclear Project Objectives/Intro vague Project Objectives & Intro satisfactory Intro and Project Objectives clear and appropriate Intro & Project Objectives well expressed and almost SMART Intro & Project Objectives clear, precise and SMART
Product/Work Breakdown Structure 20% No/ illogical PBS/WBS Poor PBS/WBS. Acceptable PBS, but incomplete. Correct diagrammatic form. Good PBS, complete, but query on content/logic Complete and correct PBS. Excellent complete, correct and detailed PBS.
Activity List & Gantt Chart 20% Activity List/Gantt Chart not produced/very inaccurate.
Lack of clarity on main Activities.
Significant activities missing on Activity List & Gantt Chart;
MS Project not used;
Resources not identified; Some questionable logic on Activity List.
Gantt Chart acceptable but contains mistakes.
Activity List satisfactory. Lack of minor resources.
Largely correct Gantt Chart;
MS Project used. Well considered Activity List.
Gantt Chart correct, resources not shown. Resources identified. Good consideration of Activity List.
Gantt Chart correct, readable and well analysed.
All resources identified for each activity.
Network Diagram 20% Network Diagram not presented or not represented as activity on node. Network Diagram illogical and critical path (CP) not identified or incorrect. Network Diagram contains some anomalies;
CP largely correct; Network diagram largely correct.
CP identified. Network Diagram good.
CP correct. Network Diagram neat and correct;
CP clear & correct;
Risk Register 20% No/ very limited identification of risks and their management An attempt made at identifying risks, but not at risk management Risks identified, initial analysis conducted Risks identified and analysed, attempt made at planning responses. Risks identified and analysed, detailed responses planned.
Evidence of risk register management. Risks identified and analysed, detailed responses planned, with proximity of risks.
Risk register management and resourcing evident
Quality Plan 10% No/ meaningless quality plan Poor description of quality responsibilities, quality criteria and quality methods Acceptable list of quality responsibilities, quality criteria and quality methods, though lacking any detail Good specification of quality responsibilities, quality criteria and quality methods Quality responsibilities, quality criteria and quality methods completed with details which are logical & consistent Quality responsibilities, quality criteria and quality methods completed to a high standard, with systems described for tracking and updating

For a custom paper on the above topic, place your order now!

What We Offer:

• On-time delivery guarantee

• PhD-level writers

• Automatic plagiarism check

• 100% money-back guarantee

• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality

• High Quality custom-written paper